Notes, not vibes
No "consider adding more depth." You get the claim, exactly where it sits, what's wrong with it, and something you can paste in its place.
Editorial scoring for SaaS content teams
Kritik reads a draft the way a ruthless editor would — what's unsupported, what's generic, what no answer engine will ever quote, what quietly loses the sale — then hands you the line, the reason, and the rewrite.
Invite-only. We're onboarding teams one at a time.
Choosing an analytics stack in 2026
BodyIn today's fast-paced digital landscape1, picking the right analytics stack is more important than ever. There are many options to choose from, each with their own strengths and weaknesses.
Our platform is the fastest on the market2, and most teams see results immediately3. Book a demo to learn more about how we can help you unlock the power of your data.
Knows what it wants to say. Hasn't yet said anything a reader couldn't get somewhere else.
Anyone can produce two thousand clean, on-topic, well-structured words before lunch. Which is exactly why clean, on-topic and well-structured stopped being worth anything. What's scarce is a page that knows something, proves it, and says it in a way a machine will quote and a buyer will believe.
Your style guide is satisfied. The reader still finished the page knowing nothing they couldn't have got from the other nine results.
Answer engines don't recommend pages, they lift passages. You can hold position three for a year and never once be the sentence that gets cited.
Push too hard and you win the click and lose the buyer. Push too little and you've written a genuinely useful article for your competitor's customers.
Kritik doesn't hand you a number and a shrug. Every note it makes arrives attached to the sentence that caused it — and, where there's a better version, the better version.
No "consider adding more depth." You get the claim, exactly where it sits, what's wrong with it, and something you can paste in its place.
Tell Kritik what you know to be true and it holds the draft to that. Figures that drift between sections, claims nobody could source, confident sentences with nothing behind them.
Comments anchored to the sentence they're about, closed when they're fixed. Not a thread in a tool nobody opens twice.
Our platform is the fastest on the market, and most teams see results immediately.
In our 10,000-row benchmark it came second at 4.1s — 1.4s behind Ardent, and ahead of everything else we tested. Teams under fifty dashboards were live the same week; the big migrations took about a month.
Two claims nobody could check, replaced with two nobody can argue with. Losing to Ardent on one axis costs you less than a superlative a reader won't believe.
Kritik is built to be hard to impress. Most honest drafts come back somewhere in the middle, and that's deliberate — a tool that hands out nineties is a tool you stop reading by the second week.
What moves the number is whether you know something first-hand, whether a stranger could check it, whether a machine can lift a clean answer out of it, whether you concede the things your competitors genuinely do better, and whether the page earns the ask at the end.
What doesn't move it: word count, keyword density, or how confident the writing sounds.
Better you know now than three screens from now.
It has opinions about substance, not commas. Keep whatever you use for those.
No volumes, no difficulty scores, no list of terms to sprinkle through the copy.
Kritik doesn't draft for you. It reads what you wrote and tells you where it gives way.
The number is there to be argued with. Disagree with a note and it has told you enough to disagree specifically.
We're taking on teams one at a time — few enough that we can sit with you while you set it up, and honest enough to tell you if your content doesn't need this yet.
One email when a slot opens. Nothing else, ever.
Already have an account? Sign in at app.getkritik.ai.